<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why doen&#8217;t the US begin using coal to produce oil?  South Africa has been doing do for years!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:45:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: meightysix</title>
		<link>http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years/comment-page-1#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>meightysix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>yeah, posting a massive article in the body where elaboration on the question is supposed to be... not the best idea.

it takes energy to turn coal into oil. you&#039;d need local power stations (nuclear would be the most efficient and cleanest) to process it without transporting it (transportation would be inefficient and you&#039;d have to have extra power generation without driving up power costs in the area that processing occured).

unfortunately, power plants don&#039;t build as fast as they do in simcity. any plants operating now would have had to have something magical known as &quot;forward thinking&quot;. I don&#039;t think we have any of that here in the States.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, posting a massive article in the body where elaboration on the question is supposed to be&#8230; not the best idea.</p>
<p>it takes energy to turn coal into oil. you&#8217;d need local power stations (nuclear would be the most efficient and cleanest) to process it without transporting it (transportation would be inefficient and you&#8217;d have to have extra power generation without driving up power costs in the area that processing occured).</p>
<p>unfortunately, power plants don&#8217;t build as fast as they do in simcity. any plants operating now would have had to have something magical known as &quot;forward thinking&quot;. I don&#8217;t think we have any of that here in the States.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nibblet</title>
		<link>http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years/comment-page-1#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>Nibblet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t even take the time to read your entire &quot;question&quot;, but, my answer is = Coal costs a lot to process, and creates more pollution.  Have you noticed that the skies in China are brown???  That is pollution.  When they are having the Olympic games, the residents will have days they will not be able to drive, and the government has halted some companies from producing their products, just so there won&#039;t be brown skies for the Olympics.  I find that fact very interesting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even take the time to read your entire &quot;question&quot;, but, my answer is = Coal costs a lot to process, and creates more pollution.  Have you noticed that the skies in China are brown???  That is pollution.  When they are having the Olympic games, the residents will have days they will not be able to drive, and the government has halted some companies from producing their products, just so there won&#8217;t be brown skies for the Olympics.  I find that fact very interesting.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years/comment-page-1#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/why-doent-the-us-begin-using-coal-to-produce-oil-south-africa-has-been-doing-do-for-years#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>Coal is not plentiful in the U. S. A.

Simple as that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal is not plentiful in the U. S. A.</p>
<p>Simple as that.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

