<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What would possess an organization responsible for safety-critical computerized systems not to have &quot;Level 4?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/what-would-possess-an-organization-responsible-for-safety-critical-computerized-systems-not-to-have-level-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/what-would-possess-an-organization-responsible-for-safety-critical-computerized-systems-not-to-have-level-4</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:45:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Minski</title>
		<link>http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/what-would-possess-an-organization-responsible-for-safety-critical-computerized-systems-not-to-have-level-4/comment-page-1#comment-2878</link>
		<dc:creator>Minski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/what-would-possess-an-organization-responsible-for-safety-critical-computerized-systems-not-to-have-level-4#comment-2878</guid>
		<description>why do these questions always appear in philosophy? Why not in modern dance? why not in family? 

No, I&#039;m serious. I want a goddamn answer. Why does this crap always show up in focking philosophy???&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do these questions always appear in philosophy? Why not in modern dance? why not in family? </p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m serious. I want a goddamn answer. Why does this crap always show up in focking philosophy???<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Easter Bunny 72</title>
		<link>http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/what-would-possess-an-organization-responsible-for-safety-critical-computerized-systems-not-to-have-level-4/comment-page-1#comment-2877</link>
		<dc:creator>Easter Bunny 72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promoonlympe.com/direct-marketing-association/what-would-possess-an-organization-responsible-for-safety-critical-computerized-systems-not-to-have-level-4#comment-2877</guid>
		<description>There may be defects in the system.
There may be serious faults that will be discovered if the system is tested properly.
Someone would rather the faults weren&#039;t discovered.
Someone in a key position is not a &quot;fit and proper person&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be defects in the system.<br />
There may be serious faults that will be discovered if the system is tested properly.<br />
Someone would rather the faults weren&#8217;t discovered.<br />
Someone in a key position is not a &quot;fit and proper person&quot;.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

